Casio Edifice EFV-540 vs Dan Henry 1963
Both are chronograph watches — here's how the specs differ and which to pick.
| Spec | Casio Edifice EFV-540 | Dan Henry 1963 |
|---|---|---|
| Movement | Quartz | Meca-quartz |
| Water resistance | 100m | 50m |
| Case size | 44mm | 38mm |
| Crystal | mineral | mineral |
| Style | Chronograph | Chronograph |
| Price tier | Entry | Mid |
Which should you buy?
- their movements differ — Casio Edifice EFV-540: quartz, Dan Henry 1963: meca-quartz
- the Casio Edifice EFV-540 takes more water (100m) — the one to pick if you actually swim or dive
- the Casio Edifice EFV-540 wears 44mm vs the Dan Henry 1963's 38mm — choose by wrist size
- the Casio Edifice EFV-540 sits in the lower price tier (Entry) if budget leads
Where to buy
Check the Casio Edifice EFV-540 price on Amazon →
Check the Dan Henry 1963 price on Amazon →
FAQ
What's the difference between the Casio Edifice EFV-540 and the Dan Henry 1963?
Both are chronograph watches. The Casio Edifice EFV-540 is quartz, 100m water resistance, 44mm, mineral crystal; the Dan Henry 1963 is meca-quartz, 50m water resistance, 38mm, mineral crystal.
Which has better water resistance, the Casio Edifice EFV-540 or the Dan Henry 1963?
The Casio Edifice EFV-540, rated 100m, versus 50m on the other. Pick 100m or higher for swimming and 200m+ for diving.
Which is better value, the Casio Edifice EFV-540 or the Dan Henry 1963?
The Casio Edifice EFV-540 is the lower-priced tier; the other steps up in build for more money — confirm both live prices at the retailer.
More chronograph comparisons: Dan Henry 1963 vs Bulova Surveyor Chronograph · Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Seiko Prospex Speedtimer Solar SSC813 · Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Dan Henry 1963 · Seiko Prospex Speedtimer Solar SSC813 vs Dan Henry 1963 · all chronograph watches · all comparisons